IF YOU SEE DIVINITY in a moonlit
sky or a field full of daylilies; if a walk outdoors fills you with reverence
more than stepping into a grand cathedral, synagogue, or mosque, chances
are good that you are a pantheist.
If so, you’re in good company. Albert Einstein, Georgia O’Keeffe,
Henry David Thoreau, Rachel Carson, Margaret Atwood, Stephen Hawking, Sitting
Bull, and Mikhail Gorbachev are just some of the notables who have counted
themselves as pantheists, subscribing to the fundamental notion that nature
and the universe merit deep reverence and awe. Believing that the universe
itself is divine, pantheists have no use for a personal, anthropomorphic
God, much less supernatural realms like heaven and hell. As Canadian novelist
and poet Atwood elegantly put it, “God is not the voice in the whirlwind;
god is the whirlwind.”
“We want to . . . take in fully the beauty, the wonder, the mystery
of things just as they are,” says Paul Harrison, author of the book Elements of Pantheism: Understanding the Divinity in Nature and the Universe
(Element Books). “Seeing in all this the reflection of some transcendent
creator-figure with a humanlike mind seems to miss the point, to pass by
the reality that’s right in front of our noses.”
The term pantheism (not to be confused with panentheism,
which holds that everything, including the universe, is contained within
the supreme being of God) was coined in 1705 by Irish writer John Toland.
But the underlying doctrine dates back to the ancient Greeks—most notably
the sixth-century philosopher Heraclitus, who denied the existence of God,
believing instead in a living cosmos where everything in the universe—you,
me, the trees, the stars, the sun—is connected in a profound unity.
Although pantheistic philosophy dominated antiquity, influencing everything
from Hinduism, Taoism, and Buddhism to Western philosophies like Stoicism,
Neoplatonism, and Epicureanism, it was eclipsed for some 1,200 years by the
spread of Christianity and Islam. Then the scientific revolution in the 17th
century—in which Copernicus proved that the earth actually moved around the
sun, thereby challenging our title as the center of the universe—laid the
foundation for intellectuals like Giordano Bruno, Benedict Spinoza, and Toland
to dare publish works advocating pantheistic principles. By the late 18th
and the 19th century, Harrison writes, pantheism had become the “religious
heart” of romantic poets and philosophers like Goethe, Blake, Hegel, Wordsworth,
and Whitman.
But pantheism waned in the first half of the 20th century as a new
faith in the power of technology took center stage; but mounting environmental
problems and the recent expansion of movements like deep ecology have granted
pantheism a renaissance of sorts. And in 1998, Harrison founded the World
Pantheist Movement (www.pantheism.net) to knit together the global pantheistic
community.
The organization now has more than 2,000 members and anticipates that
there are millions upon millions of pantheists out there who just don’t know
there is a name—or group—for their beliefs. But here’s the question: If pantheism
has been around forever, why organize now? After all, modern pantheists seem
to pride themselves on how amorphous and unstructured their practice actually
is. It can be a religion, a philosophy, or simply a way of life; rituals
are strictly optional—some pantheists choose to celebrate solstices and equinoxes
and Thoreau’s birthday; others, like Harrison, choose to spend at least half
an hour every day exploring nature—and many pantheist traditions seem right
in line with the environmental activism already espoused by many organized
groups.
“Some people think that pantheists should just commune with trees
alone and bump into other pantheists only by chance,” Harrison says. “That’s
fine as long as they’re happy with it. But we know that many pantheists feel
quite isolated, especially in largely Christian America.” Harrison believes
millions of people are becoming dissatisfied with traditional religions and
are searching for alternatives. “We want to make sure that there is a rational,
evidence-respecting, nature-revering option on offer.”